Vasquez-Palafox v. United States U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Western Division (N.D. Ohio; 3:12-cv-2380)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (Sixth Cir. 13-3599)
In a related case to Muñiz v. United States Border Patrol, ABLE filed a subsequent federal court complaint on behalf of an individual who was questioned by two Border Patrol Agents while walking down a street in Fremont, Ohio, after picking up his son at school. The plaintiff believes he was targeted for questioning because he is Hispanic. He alleges in his Federal Tort Claims Act case against the United States that two Border Patrol Agents committed the Ohio torts of assault, false imprisonment, deprivation of civil rights through ethnic intimidation, and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress. In 2013, the federal district court judge granted the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment. The dismissal was appealed and, while pending in the Sixth Circuit, the parties were able to reach a settlement in which the Plaintiff received a nominal amount.
- Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
- Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment