Author Archives: jmitchell3509f98661

CLEAR Clinic and PCUN v. Noem et al.

Posted on by

CLEAR Clinic and Pineros y Campesinos Unidos del Noroeste v. Noem et al., No. 25-cv-01906 (D. Or., filed Oct. 16, 2025)

On October 16, 2025, the CLEAR Clinic and Pineros y Campesinos Unidos del Noroeste (PCUN) filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its agents in response to a wave of over 300 arrests in October, which continued with 150 arrests in November. The complaint alleged that the government denied lawyers access to detained clients at Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Portland and Eugene field offices on multiple occasions, even when attorneys presented signed representation forms.

On October 29, 2025, the District Court denied plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order, and set an evidentiary hearing on plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction for December 12, 2025. On November 12, 2025, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint alleging and further documenting that ICE, Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and DHS have repeatedly held individuals and cut them off from communications after arrests, despite attempts by lawyers to meet with them at ICE field offices in Oregon. Plaintiffs allege the federal government then rapidly transfers clients out of the state.

Documents:

Counsel: Innovation Law Lab

Contact: Stephen Manning, Innovation Law Lab (smanning@ilgrp.com)

Press: KATU 2, Immigrant rights groups sue ICE, DHS, alleging ‘systemic assault’ on legal counsel access, Oct. 17, 2025 (https://katu.com/news/local/immigrant-rights-groups-sue-ice-dhs-alleging-systemic-assault-on-legal-counsel-access-oregon-trump-administration-immigration-anti-facist-antifa-portland-politics)

Chicago Headline Club, et al. v. Noem, et al.

Posted on by

Chicago Headline Club, et al. v. Noem, et al., No. 25-cv-12173 (N.D. Ill., filed Oct. 6, 2025) and 25-03023 (11th Cir., filed Nov. 9, 2025)

On October 6, 2025, plaintiff demonstrators filed a lawsuit stemming from “Operation Midway Blitz,” in which the Trump Administration has ramped up immigration enforcement operations and deployed federal officers led by Border Patrol officer Gregory Bovino to Broadview and other Chicagoland area locations. Civilians, elected officials, and religious leaders in the community gathered outside of the Broadview ICE facility to protest the federal response. The complaint alleges federal law enforcement, in attempting to quash largely peaceful protest and corresponding media coverage, have responded with excessively violent tactics and random arrests. The complaint alleges violations of the class members’ first and fourth amendment rights, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), and the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).

On October 9, the Court granted plaintiffs’ emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against defendants’ certain uses of force, dispersal orders, use of riot control weapons, arrest of journalists and nonviolent protestors, and concealment of identities.

On October 21, 2025, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that included plaintiffs who had been protesting against ICE tactics in Chicago neighborhoods when federal agents deployed pepper balls or tear gas against them.  Plaintiffs also filed a motion for preliminary injunction seeking further protection for protesters, clergy, and members of the press as the litigation moves forward.On November 6, 2025, the District Court issued a preliminary injunction extending the limitations on the use of force by federal officers, as delineated in the October 9 TRO. The government has appealed and sought a stay of the injunction.

Documents:

Counsel: Loevy & Loevy, Protect Democracy, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law – Community Justice

Contact:

Press: